Where is the Corbynite Offensive? A Church too Broad

As the “independents” descend like canaries into a mine testing the viability of a new centrist party the Blairites claim a new Corbynite scalp by suspending Chris Williamson MP from the Labour Party.


Chris Williamson spoke at a Momentum meeting, defiantly highlighting that Labour have been far too apologetic when dealing with the question of anti-semitism in light of ongoing criticism from New Labourite renegades. The footage of said meeting has then been used by the Labour right-wing to have Williamson suspended.

Rather than sticking to his guns Chris Williamson has immediately rolled over and apologised for his “recent choice of words” immediately ceding ground to the right when he could have continued to highlight his original point about Labour’s role in opposing racism and discrimination.

In reality, the constant chiming of anti-semitism has been part of a continuing Blairite coup to continue to undermine Corbyn and come to the rescue of the flailing Tories just as they seem to be on the ropes. Instead of coming to Corbyn’s rescue Jon Lansman, founder of Momentum, has come out attacking a large number of Labour Party members for holding “hardcore antisemitic opinions” with seemingly no challenge from the Momentum membership.


Indeed, looking at how Momentum’s website has changed it barely resembles the Jeremy Corbyn supporters group which it was initially set up to be. Instead it almost sounds like a party in its own right, laying the groundwork for a soft left splinter group which Lansman clearly hopes to spearhead by distancing himself from Corbyn by singing from the same hymn sheet as the pernicious “Labour”-right.

With such political allies as these it seems to be almost accepted as a universal truth by some of Corbyn’s so-called allies despite the support he receives from the lay membership. Other than the Socialist Party’s continued highlighting of anti-semitism being used to carry out a Blairite coup the only other voice challenging this anti-semitism narrative has come from a group of 200 Labour members in Jewish Voice for Labour. This group co-signed a letter which spoke out in favour of a Corbyn led Government in challenging antisemitism.


With such a dereliction of duty on behalf of the Corbynite wing of the Labour Party the question has to be asked where is the Corbyn offensive? Corbyn’s so called allies have been all too willing to sound the retreat when numerically they vastly outnumber the Blairites. The Blairites continue to do damage whether it be leaving the party on their own terms or staying in the party and doing their best to sabotage Corbyn’s authority from within. Corbyn wouldn’t appear so damaged if he was seen to take a lead in calling for mandatory reselection of Labour candidates and representatives. The “Labour”-right claim this to be bullying but in reality this is simply a democratic measure to hold Labour representatives to account to ensure they reflect the views of the membership which a majority of Labour Councillors and MPs currently do not.

Corbyn has been more than complicit in this passivity by continuing to bang on the broad church drum. It seems to have completely escaped his and McDonnell’s attention that they are trying to broaden the church so much that the ceiling is caving in on them. They continue to offer tea and cake to those willing to ‘knife Corbyn in the front’ and yet won’t extend the olive branch to the likes of the Socialist Party which has consistently defended rather than attacked Corbyn.

Jess Phillips claimed to want to knife Corbyn in the front

Corbyn is giving far too much ground to those that would be much more at home in the Tory Party. Rather than apologising for alleged anti-semitism he should be highlighting the pro-war, pro-austerity politics of his opponents in the Labour Party in comparison to his championing of anti-racism, anti-war and pro-socialist policies.

Corbyn is also making a serious error by being conceding a second EU referendum. As a historic Brexiteer Corbyn could have challenged the narrative being set by the two opposing wings of the Tory party on Brexit and highlighted the socialist case for leaving the EU. Halfheartedly supporting remain is one thing but to back a second referendum is quite another. This will destroy a lot of people’s already wavering faith in the democratic process if they are simply encouraged a do over to vote the “right way”. Moreover a second referendum would quickly fan the flames of a far-right movement.


If the left in Labour are to succeed in building a party for the many, not the few they need to recognise that there are those in the Labour Party that still remain in it for themselves and their friends in big business. These people can’t be compromised with or befriended they have to be removed as they do not reflect the views of the party as a whole. There is a great need for democratic mandatory reselection and a rooting out of those willing to consistently sabotage Corbyn’s leadership. The Labour Party would hugely benefit from a refounding conference bringing under its wing the socialists that have been excluded and expelled from the party and the championing rather than marginalising of the union voice within its ranks.

If this is not done then Corbyn will be in danger of becoming known as Corbyn the Brief as his opponents strangle and smother the life out of the movement that has erupted underneath Corbyn. The right-wing of the Labour Party won’t be pacified by compromises as they will only demand more. Show them the door and hand them some Tory membership forms on the way out then keep the door open for the socialists!

Feel free to like, comment, share and subscribe.

If you agree with the ideas and perspectives expressed in this blog, why not join or donate to the Socialist Party (or the Committee for a Workers’ International [CWI] if you’re reading this outside of England and Wales).





The Hollow Politics of the Gang of Seven+

On Monday 18th February 2019 seven “Labour” MPs have so far broken away from the Labour Party to form what they are currently calling an independent grouping in Parliament. They have encouraged people to get involved in building a new party and have so far set up a website but it was clear from their press conference that there is nothing new on the table.

According to their website they are claiming that ‘politics is broken’ and in their initial press conference they claim to want to move past outdated 20th century ideologies (undoubtedly a veiled swipe at socialism). However, when asked what they stood for they were less than forthcoming with a response. It is somewhat farcical to be attacking ‘broken’ politics whilst having absolutely nothing to offer but platitudes and empty phraseology.

When grilled by journalists about who they would strike alliances with they claimed that they would not build something new by linking up with the old but in the very next breath were inviting MPs from other parties to join them. Would these MPs suddenly be cleansed of their ideological leanings by joining this new formation? Of course not; they would bring their political baggage with them. The only thing that would be different is that they would be offering the same confused mish-mash of a nicer capitalism in a shiny new outfit with the same rotten core.

It has been clear for some time that the “Labour” right, the remain wing of the Tory party and the husk of the Lib-Dems are ideologically similar and so it is unsurprising that a new formation will likely form around them. All have called for a so-called peoples’ vote, in reality a chance to rerun the Brexit referendum this time voting the “right way”. This is not only profoundly undemocratic but also completely short-sighted as it would likely lead to a constitutional crisis, a further erosion in peoples’ already low expectations of the current political system and a whipping up of far-right sympathies.

The fast past the post (FPTP) system has artificially kept the two-party system limping on when it is clear in both the Tories and Labour that there are fundamental differences developing in both main parties. With Brexit throwing both parties into crisis tearing open the fissures that existed, it’s unsurprising that this split has taken place now as the clock marking Britain’s departure from the bosses’ EU runs down. It is likely that there will be a fundamental shift in British politics as the two main parties fracture and new formations begin to fill the political vacuum.

Already there is talk of some Tory MPs considering splitting from a rightwards moving Tory party. Theresa May, though a remainer has tried to satisfy both wings of the divided Tories and it becomes increasingly clear that she hasn’t succeeded in pleasing or at least placating anybody as the government faces defeat after defeat in the House of Commons. Whilst trying to placate the hard Brexiteers she could very well see a split from the remain wing of the Tories as more MPs gather around this new grouping.

Moreover there is talk of more “Labour” MPs waiting in the wings to break away from Labour’s creeping to the left. The same tired accusations of anti-semitism were levied against the Labour Party along with a culture of bullying. This is ironic considering that Chuka Umunna has referred to Labour members as dogs and Angela Smith made a gaffe on Politics Live the day the gang of seven announced their split, referring to people who are Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) as having a ‘funny tinge’.



Whilst those who have already left accuse Labour of bullying, the Parliamentary Labour Party is now attempting to strong-arm Corbyn and the Labour leadership. Threats are being issued that more will leave if Corbyn doesn’t change course. The likes of deputy leader Tom Watson are trying to play arbiter whilst also applying rightwards pressure by claiming that Corbyn needs to ‘listen to MPs’. Corbyn doesn’t need to listen to these false friends but needs to mobilise the millions to come out in support of a new general election followed by a clear Brexit strategy that protects workers’ interests from the bosses whether they be based in Brussels or London.

For the large part this ‘bullying’ element in Labour is actually the pro-Corbyn wing democratically excreting the New Labour elements out as they do not reflect or agree with the policies of Corbyn and the influx of new membership. Corbyn has more to gain not by listening to these MPs but by continuing the process that has already begun by calling for the democratic measure of mandatory reselection for all candidates looking to represent the party at both council and parliamentary level.

With the likes of Ben Bradshaw, Liz Kendall and Jess Phillips still remaining in the Labour Party it’s reasonable to expect that more discontented noise will come from within. Rather than trying to broaden the church to breaking point, now more than ever the Labour Party needs to return to its socialist roots and root out the New Labour, neo-liberal poison that has infected and crippled it since the 1980’s. The formation of a reconstituted Labour Party, built on democratic and socialist principles, inviting all those staunch defenders of socialism like the Socialist Party into a federated structure is on the order of the day.

We could see a party built to reverse austerity, stand up for workers and inspire the millions, not the millionaires to take society forward. Until then, whilst I support every tentative step forward made by Corbyn and the Labour left, I remain outside of it unwelcome for putting forward exactly these ideas with the Socialist Party. Open the door to the socialists, show the door to the Blairites.

Feel free to like, comment, share and subscribe.

If you agree with the ideas and perspectives expressed in this blog, why not join or donate to the Socialist Party (or the Committee for a Workers’ International [CWI] if you’re reading this outside of England and Wales).




Organising Young and Precariat Workers

Below is an edited transcript of my contribution to the discussion on young and precariat workers at the 2018 Committee for a Workers’ International (CWI) Summer School.

With the spread of neo-liberal policies and privatisations we have seen the replacement of well-paid, secure public sector jobs with low paid, insecure jobs in the private sector. With the collapse of Stalinism as an alternative, albeit bureaucratic and deformed economic model when compared with genuine socialism, we have seen social democratic parties move to the right as an alternative.

Similarly, trade union leaders have moved in a similar direction with many trade union leaders taking a class conciliation strategy when bosses are clearly not interested in granting concessions in this period. In Britain this has been reflected in trade union membership which is currently at a historic low. 2017 saw the lowest number of days lost to strike action in TUC (Trade Union Congress) history.

Until recently strikes were largely defensive one day strikes of a national character. We are now beginning to see more offensive strikes. These are mainly small, local or regional strikes but are often strikes to the finish; ongoing until workers score a victory or are forced back to work if the employer is able to hold out. We are seeing more wildcat strikes, often in spite of trade union leadership and sometimes outside established trade unions with the formation of new ‘pop-up’ unions.


Photo by Scott Jones

On the whole, many workers and particularly young workers are in unorganised workplaces. They face harsh conditions and management that are hostile trade union organisation. It can be difficult to organise in these conditions especially when the union bureaucracy are largely unhelpful in assisting trade union activists or supporting them when faced with a backlash by the bosses for organising.

We need to therefore build trade union consciousness and organisation from the ground up. With the political situation in many countries becoming more volatile, we cannot lose focus on the importance of industrial organisation. Often we have to start small to build confidence of workers but things can take sharp turns.

It can often take a matter of months or even years of patient explanation and recruitment to build workers’ confidence in a trade union as an effective means of engaging in struggle for the betterment of their conditions. However, there can also be flash-points in the erosion of conditions that can push workers to quickly take to trade unions.


We can be an important catalyst in helping workers draw these conclusions and can assist and often, by necessity, we will need to lead recruitment into and organisation of trade unions in the workplaces. With this it must be made clear to comrades, young and precariat workers that the bosses will not simply allow organising to take place. Bosses are likely to strike back by victimising those leading the push for workplace organisation to intimidate and deter workers from organising in trade unions.

With small numbers we can make a big impact. One comrade in a workplace can transform an unorganised workplace into one in which trade union organisation and thus the pushing forward of workers’ demands and collective action grows. Likewise, we can have a similar impact in turning trade unions decisively to the left.

In Usdaw, the shop workers’ union and Britain’s 5th largest union with over 430,000 members, we have little more than 10 active members. We recently won one of our members, Amy Murphy, to the presidency of the union. Part of the reason for this was because we were the only ones putting forward a programme of struggle. However, it is important to recognise that a big factor was a lack of union engagement with a low turnout of voters in the election.

22597 (1)

Photo by Usdaw Activist

As Marxists, the goal for us is to bridge the gap between those who are already taking to struggle or are prepared to struggle and linking it with the wider trade union movement which will help turn the union movement to the left. This can start with humble beginnings such as individual workplaces but is a necessary part of the process.

By preparing young and precariat workers for organising in the workplace we can gain authority among workers. With victories and a programme our forces can be propelled into the leadership of trade union movements as workers are increasingly forced by conditions to take the road of struggle.

The trade union bureaucracies have proven themselves completely ineffective against the advances of the bosses as they have no confidence in the working class to struggle. We are often alone in our confidence of the working class to struggle. However, we are going to have to lead by example if we are to win wider layers of the class to us.

If we can gain authority among workers and youth by organising the unorganised and striking blows against the bosses, we can raise the sights of workers not just to win better conditions under capitalism but to go further and overcome capitalism itself.

Don’t forget to like, follow and share to help expand the readership of this blog.

If you agree with the content of this blog and you would like to join the Socialist Party you can do so here:


If you would like to support our campaigns, you can make a financial contribution here:


Global Tremors, British Quakes and Party Fissures

The following is an edited version of my contribution to World and British Perspectives from the Socialist Party South West’s recent Regional Committee which took place on Sunday 4th February.


Photo: Taken from the Socialist Party website, originally from the Creative Commons

“Before discussing the situation in Britain, it is important to look at some of the trends currently taking place in global Capitalism which provide the backdrop to the economic and political processes currently unfolding in Britain.

In recent weeks we’ve seen the unfolding of demonstrations and protests in Tunisia. This is in part due to the fact that ISIS have been pushed back and are losing their stranglehold over the territory which they had held previously. ISIS formed somewhat of a safety valve to the Tunisian bourgeois as a section of those being radicalised by poor economic conditions were being attracted to ISIS. With ISIS on the retreat the radicalised workers and youth are looking to the government for answers.

Like many countries, political stability is quickly deteriorating with 9 governments being formed within the last 7 years in Tunisia. The situation in Tunisia is being aggravated by the large levels of graduate unemployment. This and many of the factors that fuelled the Arab Spring of 2011 still being present, presenting potential material for revolutionary change.

As in Tunisia, there is a layer of articulate, more middle class, workers starting to draw radical conclusions even if we are not seeing the heavy battalions of the working class being drawn in at this stage. This can easily be exemplified here in Britain with the outbreak of the junior doctors strikes, with UNISON, GMB, RCN and other unions representing the bulk of health workers remaining quiet.


Photo: Mary Finch

One of the consequences of the ongoing carnage and war in the Middle East is that there are now 11 million Syrian and 4 million Iraqi refugees. This is prompting the less than benevolent response from the EU to become ‘fortress Europe.’ This is despite many countries in Europe directly fuelling the refugee crisis by engaging in bombing Syria such as Britain.

Economic crises are aggravating political and social upheavals. War, famine and natural disasters can often trigger movements and revolutions. This can easily be seen by the recent outbreak of avian flu in Iran. The culling of chickens caused a skyrocketing of the price of eggs and chicken meat, staple foods in the Iranian diet which has led to the outbreak of protests.

Another crisis for capitalism is the development of new technological advancements which are wasted as there is no market to sell them in. As workers are continually squeezed with eye-watering austerity, they are unable to buy back what they are able to produce meaning that new technologies are not able to be utilised to their full potential as profits remaining the driving force within the economy.

The bourgeois are trying to find a way out of the ongoing economic crisis which is leading to ideological splits in their ranks. This is best highlighted by the difference of approach of US vs China.

On the one hand Trump is beating his chest over North Korea and warning China of their expansion into the South China Seas islands whilst opting to take an “America First” approach. On the other hand, Xi Jinping is portraying himself as a poster-boy of globalisation with the One Belt, One Road policy.

This is essentially Chinese imperialism at work, fuelled partly by a desire to weaken US dominance. However, the One Belt, One Road policy is also being prompted by a looming debt crisis which China hopes to export to surrounding countries by providing loans to encourage the development of infrastructure, increasing Chinese trade and influence whilst kicking the can down the road.

Trump is a right populist, opting for protectionist and often xenophobic policies. This is echoed by a layer of bourgeois in the Tory Brexiteer camp. These splits in the bourgeois worldwide over the weakness of the global economy are expressing themselves in a crisis of political representation for the bourgeois. For instance, Germany, the strongest economy in Europe, saw the worst vote for Merkel’s Christian Democrats since 1949. They are losing ground to the more prominently right-wing and anti-EU AfD party.

These ideological splits are also aggravating the National Question. In Spain, the recent push by the bourgeois Catalonian independence parties and the PP government’s repressive reaction for a move to independence has led to a huge defeat for the PP in the Catalonian parliamentary elections.

Brexit has prompted the calling of a border poll by Sinn Fein and the stoking up of sectarian troubles as the Tory party has been forced to go into coalition with the DUP.

We’ve warned of the consequences of taking an incorrect position on the National Question. It can be exemplified by the lukewarm return to Labour seen in Scotland as Jeremy Corbyn does not come out in favour of the still looming question of Scottish Independence which has also been aggravated by the Brexit referendum.


There is a growth in a broad anti-capitalist mood and the development of a primitive socialist mood. This is expressing itself largely in passive support rather than active engagement in politics that would further a socialist cause. This stems from the economic crisis of 2007/8 and the subsequent austerity. There are little prospects of recovery, especially for the poor. [This is further highlighted by the nosediving of global stock exchanges yesterday and today].

Whilst a small section of the British bourgeois were in favour of Brexit, the Brexit vote has been a huge blow to the bourgeois both in Britain and in Europe not least because it deepens the EU crisis. Wary that they would be cutting their nose to spite their face, the European bourgeois are torn between making an example of Britain to stymie the growing anti-EU mood developing across Europe, or going easy to prevent further economic uncertainty. This is particularly the case as Britain is the 2nd biggest economy in Europe.

In Britain, there is a lack of confidence by the bourgeois in the economy. The fall in the pound won’t have helped this. Yet, there is no desire for the section of capitalists to take advantage of cheaper exports and expand their share in the global markets. Instead, British capitalists are electing to sit on the cash that they are accruing which is widening the already huge chasm of inequality that exists. The British bourgeois are treading water whereas the working class are being subjected through austerity to increasing levels of poverty and misery. This could be a potential flash point in what is already a situation fraught with increasing class antagonisms.

The trigger for political upheaval is just as likely to come from Britain as from countries in the Eurozone or indeed the wider world. There is a seeming quiet on the surface in Britain and the sense that things are not moving very quickly. However, this is partly the product of a weak government that cannot make decisive moves in any direction through fear of going to pieces. Such is the potential for splits in British politics. As one comrade put it, ‘we are paddling in petrol’ with Brexit and the bourgeois reaction to a Corbyn led government providing a potential match to ignite the whole situation.

Corbynism is largely representative of the more middle-class layers. These are layers which we can win to us but working-class layers have not been nearly as motivated into action.


There are now over 500,000 members in the Labour Party; Momentum [The group set up to support Jeremy Corbyn] claims to have 35,000 members. However, through its determination to purge itself of political debate, Momentum has largely become a moribund organisation whose main contribution is to provide canvass training to bolster Blairite Councillors and MPs. Those that still engage are mainly, with some very small exceptions, of a petit-bourgeois character.

That being said, working class appetites are rising. We caught a glimpse of this in the 2017 general election with the 10% swing to Labour as Corbyn unapologetically put forward his anti-austerity manifesto. This is the biggest swing to Labour since the Clement Attlee government of 1945. If Corbyn were to be returned to number 10 in another general election we could see the working class more decisively take to political engagement.

We have seen in the recent period, growth of more offensive strikes as working class confidence to struggle grows. Strikes have largely been of a defensive character since harsh austerity measures have been doled out in the aftermath of the 2007/8 crisis. Focus had been on defence and protection of current pay and conditions whereas now small pockets of workers are starting to demand better pay and better conditions.

One feature in recent strikes by the RMT, PCS and others has been the distinctive lack of Labour lefts on picket lines. It has largely been members of the Socialist Party that have expressed solidarity on picket lines as workers take to struggle. This is in part due to the soft left Momentum types demobilising their own supporters by preaching unity. Compare this to the right-wing in Labour who have cut to the quick and made no bones about attacking and undermining the left as evidenced by the recent letter attacking Corbyn signed by 68 council leaders and Labour group leaders.


The situation is at different stages across the country, in some places right-wing Councillors have been legitimately unseated by pro-Corbyn supporters. In other areas the right-wing bureaucrats still have a firm stranglehold of the party. In Plymouth, it seems that the right-wingers in Momentum who were quick to buddy up with the Blairites have succeeded in deselecting some Councillors but are still firmly married to the idea of continued austerity. This will simply mean a changing of the axe wielders as they offer the meagre and untrue defence of ‘we’re doing the best we can.’

As the left in the Labour Party have adopted the right’s mantra of preaching unity in the Labour Party the right-wing have the audacity to launch an attack on the party leadership claiming that Corbyn and the NEC are being undemocratic. This is somewhat ironic when it was democratic mechanisms which propelled these figures into the leadership in the first place, showing where the direction of travel is heading.

It is clear that the Blairites, who would be more at home in the Tory party, wish to continue cutting and privatising in peace whilst hiding their lack of principles under the broad church of the Labour Party. Our role is often to pop the balloon [so to speak] of these Corbyn types. It is clear that whilst the Labour Party could potentially be a broad church for discussing and implementing working class policies, it cannot accommodate the Blairite, pro-austerity, pro-capitalist and thus pro-misery bureaucrats which cling to the Labour ‘brand’.

We need to pick up and innoculate those who are being frustrated by the lack of strategy to take the right-wing in the Labour Party head on. Even since the general election, by-elections have shown a 5% swing to Labour. They have also shown a swing to parties that portray themselves as anti-austerity such as the Greens, Plaid Cymru and the SNP. This shows the fertile ground that TUSC can reap in this period.

As Theresa May continues to traverse the harsh negotiations of the Brexit negotiations, there is a very possibility that we could see the Tories split as the Remain and Leave camps remain utterly divided. However, it is just as likely that we could see a split in the Labour Party as the anti-Corbyn, pro-capitalist wing act as a 5th column for the bourgeois. They would likely detonate a split if faced with the prospects of a Corbyn led government.


It remains clear that the quiet mood won’t last forever. There is an explosive mood which can rise to the surface. On Saturday we saw 500 people take to the streets of Exeter at relatively short notice to demonstrate in defence of the NHS. This mood can quickly fall back however and we need to harness and capture the mood as it strikes, with a programme and strategy to advance struggle as it breaks out.

The betrayal of Syriza in Greece marks the potential for a similar betrayal in Britain. Corbyn has done little to challenge the recent issue of Carillion and has instead relied on parliamentary methods rather than the building of a movement which will be much more reliable than those sat next to him on the Green Benches. The failures of even this limited left reformism will likely resurface under a Corbyn government.

This is not a personal attack on Corbyn but rather a warning. If Corbyn cannot face down the opposition within his own Party, is it any wonder that there are sections of the working class that have concerns about the strength of his leadership in forming a government? Particularly when said government would have to face down the sharks in the EU, the capitalist press, the bankers and the heavyweights in big business.

images (1)

More people will draw radical and revolutionary conclusions in this period and we need to be there as a revolutionary party to pick these people up, arm them with perspectives and a strategy to end capitalism.

So comrades, we need to hold our nerve, patiently explain but also prepare ourselves and those around us for the huge tremors that lay ahead and the potential for colossal battles to unfold which will highlight the power of the working class and the need for the socialist transformation of society.

There are regional variations about the current mood but it is clear that the idea of a strategy to end austerity is having to be grappled with and refuted more strongly by the Blairites thanks to our influence and intervention. The trade unions have largely been absent in organising big demonstrations and the trade union leaders have tried to apply the brakes on strike action but it is beginning to break out nonetheless.

Events are likely to get hectic as more struggles develop. It is important that we keep cool heads and plan to ensure we make the biggest impact. Events can be great teachers but we also need to be educating particularly newer comrades in Marxism. We can make steps forward, we may only be able to edge forward at this stage but we have to maintain flexibility as events can erupt around us.

We need to engage in and, where necessary, provoke events but we also need to spend time in branches with comrades, arming them with perspectives. People will be attracted to us for different reasons, some will want to ‘storm the heavens’ whereas others will want our grounded analysis in charting a course through the stormy times ahead. We need to temper our cadres by cooling the firebrands but raising the spirits and temperature of comrades who may be in danger of cooling off.

We have gained a certain authority, it is for this reason that the right-wing in the Labour Party treat us with such contempt as they have to justify why they continue to make cuts when we have highlighted a clear, and above all legal, strategy for practically opposing austerity and the Tories.


Photo: Mary Finch

Comrades, we’re not in a revolutionary period but the potential for incendiary events is there and we have to prepare the ground by building cadres and engaging in struggles as they develop, burst illusions and at each stage in a struggle lay out with workers a strategy and a programme for change.

We consistently manage to punch above our weight but we need to choose our battles carefully, be precious with our time and invest it in a balanced way between agitating and organising, between being patient and impatient in the struggle for socialism and most importantly of all between building and consolidating the party.”

Ryan Aldred


Tuesday 6th February 2018

Feel free to like, comment, share and subscribe.

If you agree with the ideas and perspectives expressed in this blog, why not join or donate to the Socialist Party (or the Committee for a Workers’ International [CWI] if you’re reading this outside of England and Wales).





Building Among Young Workers


Above: CWI Summer School

My contribution to the Youth discussion at the CWI summer school in Barcelona:

In England and Wales, one of the areas of youth work we’ve focussed on is our orientation to and development of young workers. One of the challenges of this work is getting access to young workers.

Unlike students who can be found in large numbers on campuses, there is no one place where young workers come together. This is particularly true as trade union consciousness among youth is generally low. This means that we have to go directly into workplaces to engage with and attract new layers of young workers.

One of the ways we have done this is by organising campaigns around fast food rights, £10Now and days of action exposing retail outlets that use exploitative zero hours contracts. To try and engage young workers in workplaces known to be hostile to workplace organising we have organised actions where we go into a workplace and leaflet as many workers as we can before management ask us to leave.

As well as attracting new layers we have taken steps to develop our young worker comrades. Alongside student bureaus we have had a number of meetings for young workers to discuss how we can intervene in the workplace. This has been important as young workers face more insecure and unstable conditions which can be very different to conditions experienced by older comrades.

More often than not, young workers are in workplaces that have no trade union recognition. Management can get away with more bullying and intimidation and attempts to even discuss organising can be met with extreme hostility. In drawing out these perspectives this has guided our work and allowed us to better equip our young comrades in the workplace.

By having discussions on a day in the life of a care worker, a shop worker, a waiter etc. older workers are exposed to the conditions faced by the younger counterparts and can better advise younger comrades how to recruit other workers to trade unions and get organised.

It’s also important that time is made in branch meetings to discuss the conditions of the trade unions. As trade unions will often be held in the grip of bureaucratic officials and young comrades will need guidance to give them the confidence to transform unions into militant fighting trade unions.

One of our successful areas of work in this area is in relation to Usdaw (the shopworkers’ union) which is Britain’s 4th largest trade union with over 430,000 members. We have been developing a caucus and had our biggest intervention so far at this year’s national conference. Our young comrades have been at the forefront of regenerating the broad left within the union.

Likewise, our young members put forward and spoke on a number of important motions which resonated and got some of the best responses from delegates. In time this will no doubt lead to contacts and new recruits.

The steps we are taking are currently small and the tasks ahead great but comrades, by investing time and energy into preparing young workers today, we will be developing the cadre who will have the confidence and understanding to inspire and lead the workers’ struggles of tomorrow.


On Young and Precariat Workers

Wordpress pic

Above photo taken by Mary Finch

Below is an editted version of my contribution to the discussion on British Perspectives at the Socialist Party’s March 2017 National Congress:

Ryan Aldred, Plymouth and South West

Comrade chair, comrades.

For many youths growing up in the 90’s, those putting forward a so called “alternative” to the Tories would have been Tony Blair, promising a university education for everybody and a life of prosperity thereafter. And how prosperous we are now! This was followed by Nick Clegg, promising to end tuition fees and put a brake on Tory austerity; well done there Cleggy!

It should therefore come as no surprise that in some of the most deprived areas, that young and precariat workers take a very jaded approach to Corbyn. There is some mileage in more boldly putting forward our programme among these layers. It is mainly a layer of older workers returning to the Labour Party and more politically engaged students who identify with Corbyn and recognise that he is qualitatively different from his neo-liberal predecessors.

There is a backwardness in class consciousness and particularly combativity compared to previous periods. This, coupled with the atomisation of young and precariat workers especially along with their abhorrent living conditions which can explain the increasing prevalence of mental health issues working class people are struggling to overcome. With poverty contributing to isolation and social exclusion leading to depression and the constant worry of living hand to mouth resulting in greater levels of anxiety.

It is these same material conditions which give rise to an often inchoate and elemental anger which can quickly rise to the surface and potentially spill over. Thus in this volatile period there is a danger that we could see a return of the riots which took place in 2011 as the conditions are still there which caused the riots to erupt.

Likewise, we could see a new occupy style movement albeit one on a higher political level due to the increased pace at which processes and events are taking place compared to the original occupy movement. Moreover, we’re likely to see the explosive injection of youth on demonstrations such as we have seen with the anti-Trump protests for instance.

With the lack of generalised industrial struggle in this period compared to some of the heroic struggles that took place in the Thatcher years, combined with the lack of organised opposition from Corbyn and general lack of momentum in Momentum, we could see the frustrations of youth finding expression in a resurgance of ultra-left and anarchist ideas. We have already seen this in embryo in the anti-party mood in the indignados and occupy movements and this will no doubt increase if we see further betrayals by left populist parties such as Syriza in Greece.

With all this unpredictability and volatility, one thing remains glaringly obvious, we will continue to see the accumulation of capitalist contradictions, agitating and radicalising the working class and especially the youth and more precariat layers. Improving technology is exacerbating this, self-service machines replacing shop workers and, as reported in the Financial Times this week, electronic lecturing displacing even this once secure profession.

We’ve seen the opportunities for super exploitation with apps such as deliveroo and uber eats, this has been compounded by Phillip Hammond’s budget, targetting the self-employed which will hit those in the rising gig economy hardest.

There is a desperate need for a bold and audacious alternative and in the absence of a serious fightback from the Corbynistas, TUSC is well placed to build towards that, even with the disappointing withdrawal of the SWP from TUSC. By showing confidence in our ideas and our programme, as evidenced by our strong intervention in the March 4th NHS demo, we can win new layers to our ranks and capture and hopefully harness some of that anger.

By being patient, flexible and resilient when building amongst casualised and particularly young workers, accommodating for comrades’ daily struggles, we can build confidence in these layers to take their first steps organising in the harsh conditions of zero-hours living.

This can help us to sink deeper roots into the class to ensure workers don’t internalise feelings of failure for not being productive members of a capitalist society which sees fit to discard them. By agitating among these workers to express their rightful indignation at a system that is failing them, whilst linking their struggles into the wider struggles of the working class by helping to organise these layers, we can prepare the ground for the revolutionary idea that we can instead discard this capitalist system and build with our class towards a socialist alternative.

Don’t forget to like, follow and share to help expand the readership of this blog.

If you agree with the content of this blog and you would like to join the Socialist Party you can do so here:


If you would like to support our campaigns, you can make a financial contribution here:


Corbyn Supporters Gain Momentum: Now to Reject Austerity and Build the Socialist Movement

Momentum Taking Shape

The development of Momentum has the potential to be an important step in the process of organising Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters. This is important for mobilising the swelling support for Corbyn as a means to challenging the ideas of austerity and firmly putting the ideas and policies of Socialism back on the mainstream agenda. It is clear that the right-wing Blairites that currently have control of the Labour Party machine are organising a very open coup against Corbyn as evidenced daily in the press attacks by the likes of Ben Bradshaw, Simon Danczuk and John Cruddas. Momentum has the potential to effectively counter the Blairite opposition to Corbyn but it will only realise that potential if it remains open and does not shy away from taking on those who have polluted the Labour Party over the last 30 years.

Momentum has raised the interests of many, whether old Labour members who have been disillusioned in the past by Labour’s lack of opposition to the Tories who are now coming back or new layers, inspired to get involved by Corbyn’s anti-austerity message. It has also attracted those from outside the ranks of the Labour Party to play a part in building the movement. Trade unionists, community campaigners, those not willing to throw their lot in with a particular party at this point and those in various other political parties are currently engaging with Momentum. If it remains open and broad in this way the Socialist Party will continue to support and be a part of this process.

However, Momentum is still finding its feet nationally and because of this it is fulfilling a number of different roles in different areas. In some places it is very open, democratic and welcoming of those from the wider labour movement. Yet, in other areas it is closed off to anybody outside of the Labour Party. This is a mistake as it limits the scope of debate and leaves Momentum being very insular rather than aiming to appeal to broader layers to build a mass working-class movement.

On Debate and Dealing With the “Moderates”

It is clear that there is another group which is very interested in Momentum and that group is the so-called “moderates”. The same group of “moderates” that have a stranglehold on the Parliamentary Labour Party and the majority of councils. The same group of “moderates” who are doing all they can to stop the loss of their free ride on the gravy train by trying to shut out and isolate Corbyn’s supporters. Whether it be making members feel unwelcome at meetings, duping the public by speaking socialist rhetoric one minute then putting through swingeing cuts the next or manipulating Momentum meetings to cut out any views that contradict their own, these “moderates” will stop at nothing to keep their grubby mitts firmly at the reins of a party which is steering in another direction.

Corbyn’s election promises struck a chord; a single compromise on austerity would be a betrayal of all those who have engaged and are willing to support a position of Councils coming together to oppose the cuts. Trying to compromise between the tens of thousands taking their first tentative steps into the field of politics who outright reject austerity and the thousands of Labour Councillors who have, up until now, put through austerity without any resistance but “with a heavy heart” would be an impossibility.

It is disappointing that Jon Lansman, one of the directors of Momentum, pulled out of a planned debate at the Socialist Party’s annual Socialism 2015 event recently due to the Sun releasing a “reds under the bed” article:


The terms of the debate cannot be allowed to be set by the likes of Murdoch’s gutter press. Likewise, trying to appeal or placate the right-wing in the Labour Party by compromising on policy or on the purpose of Momentum would be a huge error on the part of the Corbynistas. Furthermore, Momentum meetings should not shy away from political debates and discussions. It’s important to build and organise campaigns which people can get behind but at the same time the reasons for why those campaigns are being pursued and focussed on should be up for discussion.

Thus, anybody trying to dampen the call for political discussion or calling for unity above all in the Labour Party has to be seriously questioned on what basis that unity should or even could be achieved. There have, of course, been notable exceptions where Labour Councillors have opposed the cuts such as Keith Morrell, Don Thomas and Kevin Bennett to name but a few but they were expelled from the Labour Party for their efforts. These Councillors all did so whilst the Labour Party was under Miliband’s control but the Labour Party has not been forthcoming in welcoming these Councillors back into their ranks yet and all have found a home in TUSC (Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition). Those calling for unity without question were deafeningly silent about unity in these cases and yet these Councillors have enjoyed the popular support of ordinary working-class people for daring to actually carry through their promises of opposing austerity in deed as well as in word.

Local Elections

Corbyn’s supporters have come into the Labour Party with the Blairites rushing through the selection process for next year’s local elections in order to ensure they can exclude the new layers, many of whom won’t yet be eligible to vote in these selection meetings. It is clear to the likes of right-wing Labour MP Frank Field that if Blairite candidates were to be deselected then he would be prepared to support them as independent candidates over the legitimately selected Labour candidate. With Corbyn’s supporters effectively barred from influencing who will potentially be representing them in council chambers up and down the country in the 2016 local elections will they be prepared to support independent candidates who genuinely support Corbyn if they are stuck with Labour candidates who don’t support Corbyn?

TUSC and the Socialist Party is in the process of writing to all Labour candidates running in the local elections next year to find out where they stand on opposing the cuts. If Councillors up for reelection are willing to move no-cuts budgets at the annual budget setting meetings and if new candidates are willing to pledge to openly support Corbyn’s call for councils to come together against the cuts then the Socialist Party will be happy to not stand candidates against them. Indeed we will do all we can to help be a part of the campaign to get these people elected. However, would it be right to allow Blairite candidates a free rein to stand unopposed when they will be undermining Corbyn’s policies and doing the Tories dirty work for them by implementing the cuts which are opposed by Labour’s leadership and a quickly growing layer of working-class people?

There are many challenges ahead but unity has to be forged on the basis of a programme which rejects austerity in word and deed and emphatically rejects the ideologically driven cuts which have hammered the poor and vulnerable whilst the rich have been showered with tax breaks, bailouts and massive profits. Workers have a world to win.

images (1)

Don’t forget to like, share comment and follow.